This is an Extract from chapter Seven of the Book What If We are Wrong?
It was in 1931 or
thereabouts, under the presidency of Judge Rutherford that the name Jehovah
took on great significance in the organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses; in fact,
it was at this time that we adopted the name Jehovah’s Witnesses.
As can be seen from the
citation above, from around this time, the major responsibility laid on the
shoulders of the Witnesses was the work of bearing witness to Jehovah’s name
and to his kingdom.
This was hurled by some
as a clever move, and rightly so, it was quite clever on some levels. It made
the Witnesses feel like they were a one of a kind association, to wit, the only
Witnesses of Jehovah.
I clearly remember an
experience in the ministry where I was challenged to defend the name ‘Jehovah’s
Witnesses.’ Sitting on a lawn with a languid expression on my face, I stared at
the person I and my colleague were trying to convince with a little bit of
disparagement. His sentiments sounded just a little less than apostate to me,
and if he was a brother, I would have written him off as wicked.
Showing us the
scripture of Acts 1:8, the individual said, with quite an annoying amount of
conviction, “You should be rightly called Jesus’ Witnesses. Why are you called
Jehovah’s Witnesses?’
My colleague, seeing
this as an opportunity to pump some sense into him, recalled the scripture of
Isaiah 43:10, and reading it from our Bible, he looked up at him with a
self-satisfied expression, adopting the stance that is often encouraged: you
have got to let the people see it for themselves in the scriptures to make
headway. This did not prove efficacious, and he soon resorted to arguing things
out with the above scripture as his only reference point. At this juncture,
after quietly listening, the languid expression on my face becoming worse, I
decided to step in. I deemed it pointless to argue out this point from the Old
Testament (or ‘Hebrew and Aramaic Scriptures’ as we aptly call them. We detest
the idea that there is an old and obsolete covenant that has been replaced by a
new one. We regard the so-called old, in a very dubious manner, as being very
much essential, hence the reason we find so many parallels in our modern day
organization). Hence, I decided to use some proof from the New Testament. What
line of reasoning did I use?
Acts 15:14-17:
Sym′eon has related thoroughly how God for the first time
turned his attention to the nations to take out of them a people for his name. 15 And
with this the words of the Prophets agree, just as it is written, 16 ‘After
these things I shall return and rebuild the booth of David that is fallen down;
and I shall rebuild its ruins and erect it again, 17 in
order that those who remain of the men may earnestly seek Jehovah, together
with people of all the nations, people who are called by my name, says Jehovah,
who is doing these things,
“As you can see,” I
elaborated, “God’s name is Jehovah. And so, God has chosen people out of all
nations to be called by his name, Jehovah. Hence the reason we are called
Jehovah’s Witnesses.”
This reason did not
seem to satisfy him and he went on to emphasize Acts 1:8. Disheartened, I did
not see any reason to continue trying to prove anything. I was sure I had
explained everything I could, and this person was just being as antagonistic as
the unbelievers can get. Evidently, my colleague felt the same way, and we left
promptly thereafter, with that elusive promise to return later. But from what I
recall we never did return.
Recently, about a week
ago (24th August 2010), I was invited to attend a meeting at the
kingdom hall by a friend who was having a student talk. The theme of the talk made
for interesting contemplation: “Why Do
Many Bible Translations Not Use the Personal Name of God or Use It Only a Few
Times?”
Having investigated the
topic to an appreciable degree, I was only too glad to be present, hoping that
I would hear a more scholastic line of reasoning—anything to convince me that
we are right. What I heard, however, made me feel saddened. It was presented in
a dogmatic manner, appraising our stance without reference to the overall
facts, facts conveniently hidden from the average witness. What saddened me
more was that the ones presenting the talk were two of my very good friends,
whom hitherto I had quite forgotten about, oblivious to the seriousness of the
situation. Now see the irony:
In my mind, my research
had revealed that as Witnesses, our insistence on calling on the name of
Jehovah, has blinded us from the real issues pertaining on the ground, namely,
that as Christians, the Father himself has given us the name of Jesus—that we
should call upon this name, and that calling upon the name of Jehovah as
elaborated in the Old Testament was pointing to the future time when people
would call upon the name of Jesus for salvation, that is, our time. The sister
presenting the talk, referring to the scripture of Romans Chapter 10 verse 14
pointed out that in order to be saved people have to call upon the name of
Jehovah.
Furthermore, she said that since God wants people to know his name (Psalms
83:18), it is the devil who has blinded the minds of the unbelievers so that
the illumination of the good news about the Christ might not shine through (2
Corinthians 4:4). She furthermore commented on the greatest issue at hand,
which we hold to be the sanctification of Jehovah’s name; as Witnesses, we thus
endeavour to sanctify that name that has been greatly maligned (Matthew 6:9).
Our obsession with the
name Jehovah has been more evident in other areas too. When we hear the name
being named on other platforms, say on the platform we dissociate ourselves
from but call Christendom, we give ourselves a pat on the back and say: “We
have really done a good thing of publishing God’s name abroad.”
I once asked one of my
cousins his opinion on our strong hatred for gospel music, music that praises
Jesus; and our tolerance and hence like for secular music that has been
criticized and condemned by reputed Christians. He said: “Because they do not
mention Jehovah in it.”
It is evident from his
answer that he does not really listen to gospel, because he would have known
that the name Jehovah is often named these days in gospel songs. But this
answer works to show one thing: the name Jehovah is very sacred among
Witnesses; it is the greatest name they know. They teach this name to everyone
they come across, inculcating it into their minds. Furthermore, they make sure
that they pray using this name Jehovah (the reason often given is: to
differentiate him from other false Gods, but it is more literally dished out
that only then can he really respond. An illustration is often given the
student: suppose you were among a crowd of other people, and then someone
called out ‘You, come over here!’ None of you would respond. But if he
addressed you by your name, saying, ‘Johnny, come here!’ you would definitely
respond. In the same way, Jehovah only responds, or is more likely to respond,
if you address him by his name, Jehovah).
So you see, by lifting
up a name above all others, those other names automatically become
insignificant. That in effect is what has happened to the name of Jesus among
Jehovah’s Witnesses. The following example will illustrate how true, and hence,
serious, this really is:
On the first day of the
convention of Jehovah’s Witnesses this year (2010) themed ‘Remain Close to Jehovah’, I was anywhere but at the convention. I
had no heart for it. Let me put it this way: by the time of writing this
section of the book, the majority of the brothers harbor great animosity
towards me. There are rumours circulating around that I am no longer a Witness
even though no official announcement has been made thereto. (I must confess,
though, that I once attended a church service with the Pentecostals. According
to the policy of the organization, this act in itself would make someone cease
being a Witness. However, I have not been confronted over this yet, and I wonder
how many of the brothers are aware of this), and what is so hurting and
discouraging is that most of the Witnesses refrain from greeting me. This is
the treatment customarily meted out to someone disfellowshipped or
disassociated. Should it therefore surprise you that I found myself with no
heart to attend the convention? (Eventually, I did find the heart and attended
the other two days). On this first day, I was on campus looking for software to
fix a computer and I had in mind a certain brother. Having talked to him the
previous night, I was aware that he had already attended the convention and
that he would be there to attend to me. This brother, aware that something was
aloof with me, was curious enough to want to know more about what I tacitly described
as a defining period of my life. I gave him a few relevant details, and noting
that he was the listening sort, went on to elaborate that I have a few issues
with the ‘Faithful and Discreet Slave’. One of the issues, I explained, was
that the Slave does not tell us all we need to know about certain points, such
as the aspect of calling upon the name of Jehovah. I showed him that the
scripture of Romans 10:13 tells us we should call upon the name of Jehovah in
order to be saved. I then asked him:
“I am certain you have
heard of some people who say that to be saved, we have to confess with our lips
that Jesus is Lord. However, would you or have you ever taught that in the
ministry? Does it even sound right?”
Of course his answer
was no. I then ventured to show him the scripture of Romans 10:9, saying: “But
that very scripture is there in the Bible, in the same chapter!”
I could clearly see the
expression on his face was that of slight disdain at how I had gotten the edge
over him so easily. I ventured to show him that the scripture of Romans 10:13
and a host of others, such as Acts 2:21 really had their fulfillment in Christ
Jesus. I think I should have cut him some slack, because hearing me talk like
this about the name he adores, Jehovah, definitely miffed him. The expression
on his face soon became listless, as if he was saying, ‘Leave me alone, you
Devil!’
At first, of course, he
was all ears, but now his ears were slowly gathering wax and I knew it was time
to stop and leave. It had taken me about half a year to reach where I had, and
here I was definitely overdoing it, trying to make the brother understand all
these things in just two hours. Considering how confusing the discoveries had
been on my part, all those lone hours I used to spend cramming the Bible, I
could only imagine the tintinnabulation going on in his mind.
“I hope you will be
okay,” I told him just before we parted.
“I can handle what I’ve
heard.” He told me, but I knew only too well that I had given him some
diamond-hard cud to chew at. One thing he made very clear though was that he
was not going to join me any time soon in my pursuit of the truth. He preferred
the bliss of believing that the Slave knows best (even if they hide certain
life-saving facts from us). His most significant words were: “Why don’t you
just forget about these issues and obey, subject yourself?”
Though he promised to
get back to me, I knew that in his heart, he desired nothing whatsoever to do
with me, and it sank in deeply, that as Witnesses, we do not quite believe the
scripture of Acts 4:12, which clearly says:
“Furthermore, there is no salvation in anyone else, for
there is not another name under heaven that has been given among men by which
we must get saved.”
As far as we are
concerned, there is only one name that has been given to us in order to get
saved: “JEHOVAH.”
Do we do God’s will as
far as calling upon the name of the Lord Jesus is concerned? (1 Corinthians
1:2) That is the question that merits an answer.
See the book ‘Reasoning From the Scriptures’, pg 193, published by Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Rate This Article
![]() | 1 | 1 person thinks this article is awesome. |
![]() | 0 |
|
Comments(11)